Who came up with the idea of “Separation of Church and State”?

Where did the idea of “Separation of Church and State” originate? Many might find it hard to believe, but the revolutionary idea, quite literally, came from an English clergyman who ran for his life from Puritans trying to kill him.

Before the early settlers ever stepped foot on American soil the knowledge of thousand years of bloodshed preceded them. They knew their history and their ancestry, which significantly influenced their worldview.

Their ancestors were affected by the Protestant Reformation, which caused revolts throughout Europe and widespread famine and disease, displaced and decimated economies and populations, and propagated general confusion and distrust about the authority of the government and the role of the church as an institution.

The strife that ensued, The InquisitionThe Thirty Years’ WarThe Eight Wars of Religion in France, among other conflicts, despite the edicts or treaties designed to resolve them, had residual effects.

People continued to kill in the name of God. From the thirteenth to the seventeenth centuries, Christians slaughtered hundreds of thousands of Christians.

England consistently faced civil war over control of the crown and church. At one point the king fought and dissolved Parliament, Catholics and Protestants continued to massacre each other and King Charles I was beheaded– because both the king and Parliament wanted a national church. By 1620 the Puritans had had enough and what was known as the “Great Migration” from England to the New World began.


Among the migrators was John Winthrop, who helped found the Massachusetts Bay Colony and was its first governor. Winthrop metaphorically invoked a phrase from Jesus’s Sermon on the Mount (Matt 5:14), purposing this new colony as a “city upon a hill.” To accomplish this, Winthrop and fellow colonial leaders believed the civil government must prevent error in the church.

Paradoxically, Winthrop’s societal construct was no different from that which he fled. Roger Williams, an English clergyman and scholar, had witnessed first hand the British civil war and knew that religious freedom would be impossible within Winthrop’s societal model. Williams insisted that government be entirely separate from a person’s relationship with God. He argued that governmental authority could not interpret God’s law and any kind of forced worship “stinks in God’s nostrils.”

Involving the government in the church, he contended, would corrupt the church.

The colonial leaders viewed Williams’s ideas as a threat and the General Court of the Massachusetts Bay Colony exiled him, threatening to kill him. Williams fled during an incredibly harsh winter in January 1636. He wrote that he didn’t know “what Bread or Bed did meane” for nearly four months, and that he would have died were it not for “the ravens,” his Indian friends.

Isolated, alone, and homeless, Williams made his way to Narragansett Bay. He purchased land from the Narragansett Indians and named it Providence, expressing his:

“sense of God’s merciful providence unto me in my distress, I called the place Providence, I desired it might be a shelter for persons distressed for conscience.”

American identity would forever be shaped by the struggle brought to its shores: how to delineate individual freedom from governmental authority and how to legalize a separation between the church and government.

Roger Williams sailed to England to procure a legal charter from Parliament for his land, which became the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations. In 1644 he relentlessly lobbied Parliament and the general British public, informing them through pamphlets and pubic debate about his vision for society. His rallying cry, “Soul Libertie,” inspired many and resulted in Parliament granting Rhode Island’s charter.

Williams described the true church as a “Magnificent Garden” and the world as “The Wilderness.” He envisioned a hedge separating the “Garden of the Church and the Wilderness of the World,” meaning that once religion and politics mixed, the result was politics corrupting the church.

In Providence, Williams relinquished nearly all of the land he had purchased to a town common stock—so that other settlers could have equal property and voting rights. He also drafted a political compact that did not claim to “advance God’s will” or create “God’s kingdom on earth.” It did not establish a church or require church attendance. In fact, the compact did not mention God at all.

While those in Massachusetts were slaughtering Indians, Williams insisted:

“It is the will and command of God that since the coming of his Sonne the Lord Jesus, a permission of the most Paganish, Jewish, Turkish, or Antichristian consciences and worships, bee granted to all men in all nations and countries.” Williams, a minister wholly devoted to God and Biblical truth, believed it was “monstrous” to compel anyone to follow his or anyone else’s faith and that “civil power lies in the people.”

In July 1644, Roger Williams published his 400-page magnum opus: The Bloudy Tenent, of Persecution, for cause of Conscience, Discussed, in A Conference between Truth and Peace, in which he detailed his vision for religious freedom and limited government. His ideas dynamically upended centuries of long-held assumptions about governance.

His reasoning, buttressed by ingenious mental acuity, convinced influential men like John Milton, John Locke, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison and the architects of the U.S. Constitution that creating a workable system in which church and state could peacefully co-exist was possible.

A Christian minister made possible the idea that a government could be separate from a religious institution, which had never been done before. No government existed at the time without church authority or intervention in ruling societies. Williams’s ideas were revolutionary. He fled from the “city on the hill” to the wilderness in order to establish the most important foundational principle for any government.

His vision that no government could establish a religion or prohibit its citizens from freely worshiping, or even not practicing a religion, became a reality when the First Amendment was ratified nearly 150 years later.

June 23, 2015


This entry was posted in Rescuing the Republic, Revisiting Americanism & Christianity and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.